Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option C (Efficiency and fairness).
Explanation:
- In many disciplines across the social sciences, the concept of a trade-off between equality and efficiency and is pervasive. Also, an inaccurate notion of that well-known dilemma is indeed an essential part of politicians and policy-makers discourse.
- Philosophical experiments of the concept have indeed deflated the theoretical unity of most of its iterations, whereas the existing literature attempting to test the empirical relationship between equality and growth showed conflicting results.
- However, the scientific status of the notion of a trade-off between equality and efficiency is a matter of discussion.
Therefore, Option C is the right answer.
Answer:
The answer is primary metaphors.
Explanation:
Primary metaphors are based on a clear, side by side comparison of two concepts. This way, the meaning is fairly easy to interpret and does not require any specialised knowledge (that could happend in root metaphors, which are specific to a culture or identity) nor overanalysis, as could occur with complex metaphors.
Something interesting is that many primary metaphors may be considered by some as dead metaphors, which have become so familiar to readers that its use is now seen as "cheesy".
The link doesn’t open for me, what can i do?
Answer:
D. no system of voting can be devised that will always consistently represent the underlying.
Explanation:
The arrow impossibility theorem sates that it is not possible to obtain a preferential result in an election while also adhering to principles of fair voting.
Presidents decide whether to recognize new nations and new governments, and negotiate treaties with other nations, which are binding on the United States when approved by two-thirds of the Senate. The president may also negotiate “executive agreements” with foreign powers that are not subject to Senate confirmation.