Answer:
1.Pick an earthquake to study-maybe one that no-one is really familiar with but is very dangerous.
2.Write where it is, a LITTLE bit about what happened before the earthquake, when it happened. Include something about what people felt at the time and what they saw around them. Include what was happening while the earthquake was happening.
3. write what happened immediately after the earthquake.
4. write what happened that will leave everybody in a bad situation for a long time, e.g they didn't have houses, hospitals collapsed etc.
5. write what was going on to help and when they helped.
6.write if people recovered from the shock.
7. write about how many lives were in danger or lost- maybe some may even be missing.
8. write about that place now- if the place is better from the earthquake, then write about how it will leave the people in devastation.
Hope this helps!
Explanation:
Answer:
The USA promotes security and opportunity that justify the high cost of living.
Explanation:
Feyisa wants to seek asylum in the USA, despite the high cost of living that the country has. However, the high cost of living is a result of the country's economic quality, which will promote feyisa with security and economic opportunities that she will not find in her country, even if these opportunities are of low quality, she believes that she will have a longer life. worthy in the USA.
Answer: be brief to get interest but not narrowed, there is introduction ( first paragraph) and body (as much of paragraphs you wanna write max: 4 to 5) and lastly the conclusion where you make a small summary of the writing
If we are to match the terms of the following logical fallacies with its definition, it would be:
A) The use of popular mass appeal to convince others that they should do/believe something because everyone else does/is
Bandwagon
B) The use of an extreme example that is highly unlikely to try to discredit the action or words of another
Strawman
C) The use of finger-pointing or name-calling to attack the person making the argument instead of the argument itself
Ad Hominem
D) The use of an argument's conclusion as a premise for proving the argument (assuming what it is attempting to prove)
Circular reasoning
E) A conclusion or reply that does not follow the previous statement in a logical manner
Non sequitur
F) The use of quick judgment that is not based on facts but instead on a very limited experience to what one is judging
Hasty generalization
<h3>What is Hasty Generalization?</h3>
This refers to the type of fallacy that is used when a person rushes into a hasty conclusion about a thing from incomplete facts, which is usually incorrect.
Hence, we can see that the correct matchings has been made above.
Read more about hasty generalization here:
brainly.com/question/2955537
#SPJ1
Paz uses all of the following literary devices except:
metaphor
repetition
simile
imagery
The correct answer is simile because there is no "like"or "as" used in the poem.
