Ano ang kasingkahulugan ng nag-antada?

kenny6666 [7]

The most basic form of Spanish verbs is the infinitive. So infinitive verbs aren't conjugated and doesn't tell us anything about who is performing an action or the tense of the sentence. Thus, we need to translate the phrase by finding the infinitive and conjugating it to match the subject.

<h2>1. Right answer:</h2><h3>ayudas</h3><h3 />

Ayudas is the conjugation of the verb ayudar for the second person singular in the simple present. The simple present tense is used to talk about habitual actions or routines. This tense is also used to describe things that happen now or in the near future. Therefore, we have:

<u>IN ENGLISH:</u>

<em>You </em><em>help</em>

<u>IN SPANISH:</u>

<em>Tú </em><em>ayudas</em>

<h2>2. Right answer:</h2><h3>cenan</h3><h3 />

Cenan is the conjugation of the verb cenar for the third person plural in the simple present. This person matches <em>ellos </em>and means <em>they </em>in English. On the other hand, <em>to have dinner</em><em> </em>translates into <em>cenar</em> Therefore, we have:

<u>IN ENGLISH:</u>

<em>They </em><em>have dinner</em>

<u>IN SPANISH:</u>

<em>Ellos </em><em>cenan</em>

<h2>3. Right answer:</h2><h3>esperan</h3><h3 />

Esperan is the conjugation of the verb esperar for the third person plural in the simple present. As you can see, we also use they (ellos) here. On the other hand, <em>to wait</em><em> </em>translates into <em>esperar </em>that is a verb meaning a period of time during you wait for something. Therefore, we have:

<u>IN ENGLISH:</u>

<em>They </em><em>wait</em>

<u>IN SPANISH:</u>

<em>Ellos </em><em>esperan</em>

<h2>4. Right answer:</h2><h3>respondes</h3><h3 />

Respondes is the conjugation of the verb responder for the second person singular in the simple present.This person is tú and matches you in English. On the other hand, <em>to answer</em><em> </em>translates into <em>responder</em>. Therefore, we have:

<u>IN ENGLISH:</u>

<em>You </em><em>answer</em>

<u>IN SPANISH:</u>

<em>Tú </em><em>respondes</em>

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Helppppp ASAP mark you Brainliest if it RIGHT, Read then answer the 1 question.

natta225 [31]

Answer:

I think it's C, the third option. Sorry if i'm wrong!

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why did Benedictine monks take vows of silence?

denis-greek [22]

Answer:

Most monks in Buddhism take a vow of silence in order to train themselves in the right speeches. That is to say, they believe that not saying everything that comes to mind will help them keep out harmful words. As a result, the monks will be able to pick out the words that best suits the moment.

Can I get Brainliest?

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Please, ayuda, gracias

marissa [1.9K]

Hey! it’s super blurry, maybe try taking another picture

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which sentence from anti-federalist paper No 2 best states Dewitt argument

brilliants [131]

Answer:

<em>Federalist No. 2 is an essay told by John Jay, the second of The Federalist Papers, it had of 85 essays simply to be understood by for the modification of the United States Constitution. The essays or methods, written by James Madison, together with ,Alexander Hamilton were issued under the pseudonym Publius. The Federalist No. 2, titled "Concerning Dangers From Foreign Force and Influence, was made on October 31, 1787, as the the very first of many essays made by Jay where he states the merits of a unuited government over other sovereign nations, where he discussed on areas where a united country can make better laws and efficiently in resolving conflicts and having a better protection against other nations. </em>

R<em>eferences taken from</em>

<em>Federalist Papers - Facts & Summary - "HISTORY.com". HISTORY.com. Retrieved October 24, 2016. </em>

<em> "The Federalist 2 The Complete Federalist Papers 1786-1800 Documents, "American History From Revolution To Reconstruction and beyond". www.let.rug.nl. Retrieved October 25, 2016.</em>

Explanation:

The letter Written by John Jay called the Federalist Paper Two focuses more about a unified nation or country . then proposition made by Jay states that a strong unity of the colonies would be the best method for nations or countries in years to come

In his essay he said those who thinks the division the United States of America would be more better than a united one. He went to state clearly that a strong system is needed for a good nation, and a division of the states to smaller entities would not be of good benefit.

Jay states that a government that is unified is vital in tackling problems within a country. long before the United state constitution , states had their own foreign methods an currencies, which before hand made trading between other countries and states had.

Also government then had no influence on how to remit tax from states which was supposed to be used by Government to pay back Debt it incurred form the past revolutionary war

<em>Reference from "10 reasons why America's first constitution failed". Constitution Daily. November 17, 2015. Retrieved October 24, 2016</em>

8 0

3 years ago

Ano ang kasingkahulugan ng nag-antada?​

Ano ang kasingkahulugan ng nag-antada?