Answer: 21599373.37618
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."
The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true, then q is also correct or true.
And the converse of p → q can be shown as q → p.
But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.
In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be "A line can be a part of the ray".
So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.
Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.
Hence, Jahmiah is correct.
Answer:
x = 15
LN and MO both equal 43
Step-by-step explanation:
LN and MO are diagonals in rectangle
Diagonals of a rectangle are congruent Hence, 4x - 17 = 2x + 13
Now we solve for x
4x - 17 = 2x + 13
Add 17 to both sides
4x = 2x + 30
Subtract 2x from both sides
2x = 30
Divide both sides by 2
x = 15
Now we want to find the values of LN and MO
To do so we substitute 15 for x in it's given expression ( note: because LN = MO we only need to do this process once )
LN = 4x - 17
Substitute 15 for x
4(15) - 17
Multiply
60 - 17
Subtract
LN and MO = 43
Answer:60%
Step-by-step explanation:
