Answer:
1. The narrator is a young European man who was hated by the Burmese people. His job as a Policeman worsened the hatred of him.
2. He was upset, sad, and angry at the treatment he received from the Burmese people.
Explanation:
In Shooting an Elephant, I could deduce that the narrator is a young European man who disliked his job and was hated by the Burmese people. The discrimination could be seen in his everyday life. When he went to play football, he was treated harshly by his playmates and referee.
On the streets, people sought to trap him and beat him up. The narrator was oppressed and the main reason could be attributed to his being a European. He secretly sided with the Burmese people and was against their British
Explanation:
To think critically is basically the process self-regulatory judgment. Critical thinking is the process by which a reasoned consideration to evidence, context, methods, and criteria are included.
The <em>“Thylacine”</em>, best kwon as a "Tasmanian Tiger", was kind of a marsupial wolf now extinct. It was a carnivore predator that ambushed its preys.
Thylacines or Tasmanian Tigers were part of the <em>Australian</em> landscape in the past. Two things influenced the diminish of Thylacines: the arrival of men 40,000 years ago, and the dingo dogs brought by men about 4,000 years ago.
The last species of Tasmanian Tigers were taken the island of Tasmania. The last of the species dissapeared in the mid-1930’s.
The answer would be illustrator because an illustrator is a person who illustrates. :)
