1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bezzdna [24]
3 years ago
15

Was the dropping of the atomic bomb justified ( pls answer with 200 words or more if possible)

History
1 answer:
Andrei [34K]3 years ago
7 0
<h3>The dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was justified at the time as being moral – in order to bring about a more rapid victory and prevent the deaths of more Americans. However, it was clearly not moral to use this weapon knowing that it would kill civilians and destroy the urban milieu.</h3>

<h2>please mark in brain list </h2>

You might be interested in
If the demand for a good increase without its supply increasing what change will occur
77julia77 [94]

the price of the product will go up

6 0
3 years ago
What event above is being depicted in the cartoon to the right? Explain
anzhelika [568]

Answer:

The political cartoon entitled "He Wouldn't Take it Any Other Way" by Victor Gillam shows the exaggeration that Filipinos were savage-like creatures, unaware of civilization, and lived a rather outdated lifestyle similar to the Native-Americans. Another exaggeration in this comic is the paper at the end of the knife pointing towards the Filipino man reading:

                                         'Liberty and Civilization'

which basically represents the Americans' view of the Filipinos being reluctant to accept the United States' offers of "liberty and civilization" which they forced upon the Filipinos to accept, anyway.

The "bringer" of "Liberty & Civilization" is depicted as the United States (drawn by an American at the time). The bringer seems to be using force and threatens the Filipino with a knife. This demonstrates how the United States will go as far as threatening those of the land which they are trying to posses.

The message of this cartoon is somewhat biased, however it could be depicted as something along the lines of the following:

- The Filipinos were underdeveloped people who were reluctant to accept the offers of the willing Americans, and the only way they'd accept is if the Americans threatened them.

                                                        or

- The Philippines were possessed by the United States and, willing to improve and maintain their territory, were reluctant about accepting what the U.S. has to offer.

The message of the cartoonist seems to lean towards the first message, and that the United States only wanted to help the Philippines.

Obviously, with the cartoonist's message in mind, they are in favor of U.S. imperialism, as the expansion of U.S. territory out of boundaries is no problem, even if those of the territory are reluctant towards the idea.

///

If you have any questions, please ask. Hope I helped and good luck!

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What countries use democracy today?
joja [24]
United states, United Kingdom, Canada, Brazil, Russia, Pakistan, India, France, Denmark, Japan, South Korea. There are many more
.
3 0
3 years ago
Based on the map, which of these statements is true of Christianity? It was limited to the empire's boundaries before 325 CE. It
andrezito [222]
<span>Its spread was limited by the Mediterranean Sea. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
"The majority, oppressing an individual, is guilty of a crime, abuses its strength, and by acting on the law of the strongest br
marishachu [46]
<span>The rule of law is an essential principle in the nation but not nearly as important as the idea of majority rule. The rule of law is the most important principle in the nation where votes of the majority determine the laws. The rule of the majority with protection for the minority's rights is essential for preserving the liberties of all. The rule of the majority is the only principle on which this nation should run in order to protect democracy.
OR
</span><span>Jefferson was Anti Fed, so he wanted maajority rule and less central government. but later in his second term, he kept some of hamilton's financial programs (which were heavily federalist), but following the quote, I would say d.</span><span>


</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can someone please help me , i will mark the brainliest one ! thank you so much
    11·1 answer
  • What did mahatma gandhi believe
    10·1 answer
  • How was the duel monarchy organized?
    8·1 answer
  • What fundamental problem did Noah Webster see in the articles of confederation a. That states would always work in their own sel
    15·1 answer
  • Are your sure because I do not get it or understand it?
    6·1 answer
  • Which was not a goal of the Chartist movement?
    9·1 answer
  • CAN SOMEONE HELP ME ANSWER THIS QUESTION! ‼️
    10·1 answer
  • 1) How were areas in the Midwest and Southeast changing during the late 19th century?​
    9·1 answer
  • If there was only one political party, why were there four candidates for president in 1824?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following events occurred first?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!