1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gulaghasi [49]
2 years ago
5

I want you to write the story of Rasputin. Go read up on who he was, what he did, how did his gain power and finally what happen

ed to him. Then write a paragraph or more one each. There should be AT LEAST one paragraph on 1. Who he was 2. What did he do 3. How did he gain his power 4. What happened to him. Any plagiarism will result in a 0. I am looking for complete sentences. Do not forget to cite your sources!
whoever does this will get brainliest and $30 cashhapp. please let me know .
History
1 answer:
Fiesta28 [93]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Grigori Yefimovich Rasputin (/ræˈspjuːtɪn/; Russian: Григорий Ефимович Распутин [ɡrʲɪˈɡorʲɪj jɪˈfʲiməvʲɪtɕ rɐˈsputʲɪn]; 21 January [O.S. 9 January] 1869 – 30 December [O.S. 17 December] 1916) was a Russian mystic and self-proclaimed holy man who befriended the family of Nicholas II, the last emperor of Russia, and gained considerable influence in late Imperial Russia.

Rasputin was born to a peasant family in the Siberian village of Pokrovskoye in the Tyumensky Uyezd of Tobolsk Governorate (now Yarkovsky District of Tyumen Oblast). He had a religious conversion experience after taking a pilgrimage to a monastery in 1897. He has been described as a monk or as a "strannik" (wanderer or pilgrim), though he held no official position in the Russian Orthodox Church. He traveled to St. Petersburg in 1903 or the winter of 1904–1905, where he captivated some church and social leaders. He became a society figure and met Emperor Nicholas and Empress Alexandra in November 1905.

In late 1906, Rasputin began acting as a healer for the imperial couple's only son, Alexei, who suffered from hemophilia. He was a divisive figure at court, seen by some Russians as a mystic, visionary, and prophet, and by others as a religious charlatan. The high point of Rasputin's power was in 1915 when Nicholas II left St. Petersburg to oversee Russian armies fighting World War I, increasing both Alexandra and Rasputin's influence. Russian defeats mounted during the war, however, and both Rasputin and Alexandra became increasingly unpopular. In the early morning of 30 December [O.S. 17 December] 1916, Rasputin was assassinated by a group of conservative noblemen who opposed his influence over Alexandra and Nicholas.

Historians often suggest that Rasputin's scandalous and sinister reputation helped discredit the tsarist government and thus helped precipitate the overthrow of the Romanov dynasty a few weeks after he was assassinated. Accounts of his life and influence were often based on hearsay and rumor.

You might be interested in
Which of the following best describes the Ottoman Empire in the years just before World War I? strong and powerful eager to inva
snow_lady [41]

Weak and in decline.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
was the trial of tears necessary to advance civilization as president Jackson said, or a cruel injustice to the cherokee
kaheart [24]
This would depend on your beliefs. Personally, I believe it was a cruel injustice to the Cherokee, and that the Trail of Tears was nowhere near necessary to advance civilization. However, this question is asking for your point of view on the matter. Using the information you have learned, reflect on the event and come to your own conclusion. Hope this helped! ^.^
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the Nazis decide to do about ridding their nation of Jews as quickly as possible?
NNADVOKAT [17]
They gassed them 
hope this helpssss

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
To what is the growth of civilization most clearly traced?
xxMikexx [17]

C. Farming

I just took the quiz. please mark brainly.

8 0
3 years ago
Why should historians avoid oversimplifications when analyzing sources?
Mekhanik [1.2K]

Answer:

The correct answer is <u><em>B) Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory  evidence</em></u>

Explanation:

History is not always easy to study and the further we go back, the further we have to rely on second hand or third hand sources.

For example, in order to study something that happened 20 years ago is fairly easy since it would be recorded either in newspapers, books, or even video.

However, it is not always easy to draw conclusions when we are studying an event that took place 2,000 years ago.

Most of them times we rely on information passed on from generations before until finally someone wrote it down.

While many historians get tempted to Over-simply an event to draw certain conclusions, this should not be practiced as it creates a bias and forces us to study or even research for contradictory evidence. Sometimes, this contradictory evidence can completely change our understanding of the event.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which were th's native people who dug hundreds of miles of irrigation channels
    14·1 answer
  • *****CRIMINAL JUSTICE*****
    14·1 answer
  • In the 1790s, why did the revolutionary political leaders become divided over the course of the new nation? what was the result?
    8·1 answer
  • Another name for the war in Europe
    9·1 answer
  • The event that took place on March 5,1770, in which British soldiers killed a group of colonists was known as?
    13·1 answer
  • Which country did Mehmed II NOT conquer?<br> Egypt<br> Hungray<br> Romania<br> Italy
    8·1 answer
  • Why was general aung san asassinated
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a factor that led to the American Revolution?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a true statement about the right to vote?
    9·2 answers
  • What are the first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution called?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!