The Enlightenment influenced America's belief that we, the people, have a right to form our own government. The American democracy's arrangement of a separation of powers (checks and balances) also came from Enlightenment thought. There were other influences too, but those are two big ideas that came from the Enlightenment and were implemented in the USA.
Some details.
- Ideas about the people's sovereignty came from thinkers like John Locke of England and Jean-Jacques Rousseau of France. Both of them were writing philosophy about how the people should be the ultimate authority in a state -- that a government gets its power from the people and needs to serve the interests of the people. That idea was referred to as the "social contract." Rousseau famously wrote a book with that title -- <em>The Social Contract -- </em>published in 1762. John Locke had published <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government</em> in 1690. Locke repudiated the views of divine right monarchy in his<em> First Treatise on Civil Government</em>. In his <em>Second Treatise</em>, Locke argued for the rights of the people to create their own governments according to their own desires and for the sake of protecting their own life, liberty, and property. Locke always favored the people remaining in charge, and asserted that the people have the power to change their government and remove government leaders if the government is not properly serving the needs and well-being of the people.
- The "Separation of Powers" principle was an idea embedded into the plans for American government by our founding fathers, based on their reading of Enlightenment political theory. The terminology "separation of powers" was introduced by Charles-Louis de Secondat, the Baron of Montesquieu. (Usually he's referred to as just "Montesquieu.") He wrote an important work of political theory called <em>The Spirit of the Laws</em>, published in 1748. Within his treatment of how governments will function best, Montesquieu argued that executive, legislative, and judicial functions of government ought to be divided between parts of the government, so that no one person or division of the government can infringe on the overall rights of others in the government or of the members of the society overall.
Answer:b. actus reus.
Explanation:
Actus reus:
Actus reus is derived from Latin word which refers to a criminal act.
Criminal acts are considered based whether the crime commited was physical (actus reus) or it was based on mental instability (mens tea).
Actus reus is when someone knowingly commit an act that is prohibited in a criminal law , a person intentional makes a move that will harm another person; this can be a physical assault or murder.
Not doing something that can help someone in danger which is known as omission is also under actus reus.
However if the criminal act that a person committed was involuntary it doesn't fall under actus reus like an action committed when someone may have been asleep.
Rashaad knowingly and voluntarily short his wife and friend whilst he was in his right state of mind and also being well aware that this physical action in which he pulled a trigger will harm his wife and friend.
The answer would be developing insight into negative feelings about weight removing.
Hope this helps!
B, developing nation. Although the rest of your sentence suggests economical struggles, the fact that it's developing itself through the emergence of industry means it is undergoing development. :)
Answer:
One morning I shot an elephant in my pajamas. How he got into my pajamas I'll never know.
Explanation:
