Answer:
Contractionary fiscal policy to prevent real gdp from rising above potential real gdp would cause the inflation rate to be <u>LOWER</u> and real gdp to be <u>LOWER</u>.
Explanation:
A government engages in contractionary fiscal policy when it decreases spending or increases taxes. This is done to lower the economy's inflation rate, but it also decreases aggregate income which will decrease aggregate supply, resulting in a lower real gross domestic product.
If She makes an average of $200 per week and her parents send her a monthly allowance of $100. Her net income is $113.
<h3> Income Statement </h3>
Marsha’s Income Statement for the current month
Income $900
[($200 per week×4 weeks)+$100]
Total Income $900
Expenses:
Cell phone $62.00
Gas, $100.00
Food $200.00
Entertainment $100.00
Car payment $200.00
Insurance $125.00
Total expenses $787
Net income $113
($900-$787)
Therefore her net income is $113.
Learn more about Income Statement here:brainly.com/question/24498019
Answer:
The correct answer is Short run profits in the potato chip market.
Explanation:
The amount of the short-term gain is the difference between the capital asset base, usually the purchase price paid to buy it, and the sale price received for selling it. This means that short-term gains are generally taxed at the highest marginal tax rate of the taxpayer, while long-term capital gains are taxed at the tax rate of capital gains, which is often lower than the tax rate. marginal of a person.
The proposed scenario corresponds to a temporary situation, which can be caused by a specific event, a weather station, accessibility, etc. For this reason it is expected that in the short term sales of potato chips will increase, and on the contrary those of pretzels will decrease.
Sellers of both fries and pretzels know in advance what the behavior of their merchandise is, and they will recognize that the increase in one will mean the decrease in the other and vice versa.
Answer: d. Sell 210 shares and loan out the proceeds at 8 percent
Explanation:
Because the Firm wants to use a Debt to Equity Capital structure instead of an All Equity structure, she can lend money out at the company interest rate to NEGATE the conversion.
She can do this by selling 35% of her portfolio and loaning it out at 8%
35 % of her Portfolio would be,
= 0.35 * 600
= 210 shares
So she can sell 210 shares and loan at the proceeds at 8% to offset the Company's conversion
