The dictionary defines resources as the set of elements available to solve a need or carry out a business. There are several types of resources. Two large categories are those of renewable and non-renewable resources. The non-renewable exist in fixed quantities, nature can not recreate them in short geological periods. Renewable natural resources, on the other hand, can be restored by natural processes at a speed higher than that of consumption by human beings.
In a company we can talk about human, financial, material, technical and technological resources.
1- The human resource is paramount in the operation of any company. And it depends on the management and operation of other resources. (employees and collaborators who work there)
2- Financial resources: they are the own and foreign resources of economic and monetary character that the company requires for its operation.
3- Material resources: tangible assets of the company (facilities, equipment, raw material)
4- Technical and technological resources: Tools and auxiliary instruments in the coordination of other resources.
Well this one is a tricky one.The answer to this is 56/152
Breaking down "nature of this covenant"...
<em>Nature</em> refers to the characteristics of the covenant
A<em> covenant </em>is an agreement, sort of like an informal contract
While you didn't provide us with Chapter 19, versus 5 and 6, reading the rest of the question it can be inferred God is telling the Israelites to "keep his covenant."
To answer the question "What is the nature of this covenant?" read the chapter and ask yourself the following questions:
Is God stern with the Israelites? Helpful? Angry? Happy? Does He feel bad for them? Does He take pity on them? Are they loyal to God?
Does God get more out of the covenant than the Israelites do? Who does the covenant benefit more?
How do the Israelites feel about the covenant? How do they feel about their current situation in general? Does the convenant calm them? Inspire them?
B. They wanted to replace their own culture with the colonizers' culture
is not one of the reasons many Pacific Islands still have close ties to their former colonizers'.
