Answer: The right to privacy
Explanation:
The correct answer would be option C, It is void.
An unscrupulous investor completes a contract with a buyer to sell a property the investor does not own. This sales contract for the transaction is Void.
Explanation:
When something is not legally bounded, or there is no legal restrictions to carry that thing, then this would be considered void. An invalid, null or cancelled thing is called as void.
So according to the question, when a dishonest, and unfair person or investor makes a deal with the buyer to sell a property which he does not own, and goes into a contract with him, then the contract is void, because the person himself does not own the property he is going to sell. There will be no legal binding of this contract.
Learn more about Void Contract at:
brainly.com/question/9582675
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer: since the other person was no help, it is true.
Answer:
Jews
Explanation:
Darius was the third Persian ruler after Cyrus the Great. Darius was very instrumental to the building of the temple in Jerusalem, by the sixth year of this reign the second Temple had been completed after permission had been earlier given about 16 years ago by Cyrus but there wasn't action to match this permission Darius allowed the construction to proceed against all odds and not only did he do that, he also helped the construction efforts along by providing resources from his royal treasury.
