Although both positions have a lot of merit and make a lot of sense, I would have supported the Federalists. I believe that this would have been likely, as their ideals match my own more closely. The Federalists believed that a strong federal government is preferable to strong state governments. I believe this to be the case, as a strong federal government is more likely to be able to ensure equal rights and protections across state lines. Moreover, a federal Constitution has the power to control the excesses and abuses of the federal government. Finally, I believe that new, modern industries were the future of the country, as opposed to farming.
Answer:
Most likely an interventionist approach
Explanation:
Answer: allowed states to make decisions for themselves.
Explanation:
To be very precise social organisations have the following functions and dysfunctions
Division of labor and ensuing organic solidarity in industrial societies
Ensuring cohesion of the society through agencies like religion
Serve as reference group for evaluation and mobility of individuals
Work as a collective for development and articulation of interest issues thus pushing the political and democratic processes
Norma emerge and evolve through the inter and inra interaction of social organisations. These norms are binding (soical facts) on the individual thus shaping her behavior to a certain extent
Social organisations serve to develop class consciousness and seek changes in the political and economic sphere thus ensuring equity
Answer:
I think you forgot to add an attachment. Idk what book you are talking about. Sorrrrrryyy.
Explanation:
