Answer:
jtyjytdddddj
Step-by-step explanation:
ryjhyjejytjtyjtujyjyt
should answer your question
Answer:
10,3,6
Step-by-step explanation:
Just count
Answer:
᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌
Since it is observed that I z I = 3.464 > 1.96 it is concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.
Therefore we reject John's claim.
Here:
we can use 1 sample proportion test to check the claim of John
H₀ : p₀ = 0.4
H₁ : p₀ ≠ 0.4
Test statistic is
z = p - p₀/√p₀(1-p₀)n
Let X be the random variable denoting the number of heads.
Now p = X/n
= 8/50
= 0.16
p₀ = 0.4
1-p₀ = 1-0.4
= 0.6
z = -3.464
since it is observed that I z I = 3.464 > 1.96 it is concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.
Therefore we reject John's claim.
Learn more about Null hypothesis here:
brainly.com/question/15980493
#SPJ4