A leading behavioral economist shows how businesses can improve consumer thinking and decision making on screens. acclaimed behavioral economist shlomo bernatzi reveals a toolkit or interventions for the digital age. using provocative case studies and engaging reader exercises.
Answer:
Revenue = 240000×49= 11,760,000
Variable manufacturing expense = 240000×20 = 4,800,000
Sales commission expense = 240000×8 =1,920,000
Fixed manufacturing overhead = $2,400,000
Fixed operating expenses = 245,000
Sales promotion = 140000
Profit = 2,255,000
Explanation:
Capital: The most important city or town of a country or region.
Capital goods: Goods that are used in producing other goods, rather than being bought by consumers
Answer:
(A) $110,000
(B) $44,000
(C) $440,000
(D) $176,000
Explanation:
Parent corporation invested $1,000,000 in sub corpora tion for 25% of its outstanding stock
Sub corporation pays out 40% of net income of dividend each year
(A) Parent's Co's share of Sub's Co's net income for the year is $110,000
(B) Parent's Co's share of Sub's Co's share of dividend for the year is $44,000
(C) The total net income can be calculated as follows
= 110,000 ×100/25
= 11,000,000/25
= $440,000
(D) The total dividend for the year can be calculated as follows
= 440,000 ×40/100
= 440,000 × 0.4
= $176,000
Answer:
A. Jack cannot bring in the evidence of the oral agreement because of the Parol Evidence Rule.
Explanation:
The Parol Evidence rule is a rule in the Anglo-American common law that governs or determines the types or kinds of evidence that parties to a contract dispute can introduce when trying to determine the specific terms of a contract.
The rule also prevents introduction of further evidences by a party after a final written document or agreement has been reached. Things such as the content of oral discussions from earlier in the negotiation process, as evidence of a different intent as to the terms of the contract. The rule states that "extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to vary a written contract". The term " patrol" refers to "word of mouth" hence it is referred to oral pleadings in a court case.
Therefore from the question, Jack cannot bring in evidence of oral agreement into the court for evaluation because of Patrol Evidence Rule.
