Answer:
The major premise is lack of House to pay attention towards the road ahead of him and the rule of contributory negligence. By using this jurisdiction, the plaintiff's damages will be reduced.
Explanation:
- The defendant driver, while he may ultimately be liable if all of the witnesses say he ran the stop sign, will raise the comparative fault of House for failing to keep a proper lookout and failing to take evasive action to avoid a collision.
- The defenses are the same as they would be if the collision was with another car instead of a bicycle.
- House had an ordinary duty to pay attention to the road ahead of him and keep himself and others safe.
- By watching his books and not the traffic, he breached that duty.
- I'm not saying that defense will be successful, but that's what would be alleged by the car's driver as a defense.
- In most states, the damages to the plaintiff will be reduced by the percentage of his/her comparative fault (also known in some jurisdictions as contributory negligence).
- In some states, if the plaintiff's comparative fault is shown to be over 50%, there will be no recovery at all.
Answer and Explanation:
All 50 states have legislatures made up of elected representatives, who consider matters brought forth by the governor or introduced by its members to create legislation that becomes law. The legislature also approves a state's budget and initiates tax legislation and articles of impeachment.
Answer:
The answer according to the severity of crime would most likely be probation.
Explanation:
The judge will grant probation and the inmate has to comply with the terms.
Hello. You forgot to enter the answer options. The options are:
A. Most of the executives were secretly blue-collar workers.
B. Companies were careful never to violate American law.
C. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was unintentional.
D. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was intentional.
Answer:
D. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was intentional.
Explanation:
Edwin Sutherland was surprised to discover scenes of corruption and violation of laws within American industries. He was even more surprised when he discovered that these violations were done intensionally, promoting the benefit of entrepreneurs who had no commitment to order and honesty. These crimes are known as White Collar and are made by people who already live a wealthy life and without economic difficulties.
Can you explain this differently so i can answer it ?
