1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yulyashka [42]
3 years ago
11

Each of the following is a category of tort law except: Select one: a. Invasion of privacy. b. Strict Liability Tort. c. Neglige

nt tort d. Intentional tort
Law
1 answer:
Nata [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

a. Invasion of privacy.

Explanation:

Tort law decides if an individual ought to be considered legitimately responsible for a physical issue against another, just as what sort of remuneration the harmed party is qualified for.

There are three main categories: intentional torts, negligence, and strict liability.

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP
Marta_Voda [28]

Answer:

yessssssssssssss

Explanation: they go out there way becous they have to put us in more dept and many more

5 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ME I WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST
Nina [5.8K]

Answer:

A. Witness

B. Feedback

Hope this helped.

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The common law of Europe in the dark ages was developed by custom and usage,
Olin [163]
This answer would be true
8 0
3 years ago
What are the benefits of having several state permits a practice that is generally banned throughout the United States?
iragen [17]
This is when states become a “laboratories for Democracy”. This means that while federal law may say one thing about a certain issue/policy, there is sometimes overlap in jurisdiction that allow states to go against the Federal Government. A benefit of states being laboratories for Democracy is that they are able to implement policies that they feel is best for citizens of their respected state. A quality example of this would be the legality of marijuana. While marijuana is still illegal at the federal level, many states (colorado, california, washington, etc) have decided that the consumption of marijuana is legal for recreational use, despite federal law that prohibits it.
4 0
3 years ago
In order for a plaintiff to win a case involving intentional infliction of emotional distress, she must prove the defendant acte
Ratling [72]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

If she proves that she committed a crime and went against the law that is enough. Nothing to much more than that matters.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • There are
    11·1 answer
  • Which type of government is most beneficial for its people? Which do you think is least beneficial?
    6·1 answer
  • What was the last state to ratify the articles of confederation
    9·1 answer
  • WILL MAKR BRAINLIEST
    9·2 answers
  • The penal code section for sex registration is
    6·1 answer
  • Can the police get you out of your car, without a permission or an excuse?
    11·1 answer
  • What happens if law enforcement does not follow proper crime scene procedures?
    6·2 answers
  • Should i ude the P90 on modern warfare?
    6·1 answer
  • The group of test subject that are NOT given the experimental treatment Il<br> what?
    5·1 answer
  • Deducciones autorizadas por la ley
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!