Answer:
They basically just pushed out a bunch of native tribes from their homelands since they believed that it was their "God-given" right to expand westward and get more land space.
Explanation:
I mean I don't know if that's what you're looking for but that's all that you really need to know.
“One of the strangest controversies in the history of Orientalism turned upon the “origin of bhakti”, as if devotion had at some given moment been a new idea and thenceforth a fashionable one. It would have been simpler to observe that the word bhakti means primarily a given share, and therefore also the devotion or love that all liberality presupposes; and so that inasmuch as one “gives God his share” (bhagam), i.e. sacrifces, one is his bhakta. Thus in the hymn, “If thou givest me my share” amounts to saying “If thou lovest me”. It has often been pointed out that the Sacrifice was thought of as a commerce between Gods and men: but not often realised that by introducing into traditional conceptions of trade notions derived from our own internecine commercial transactions, we have falsified our understanding of the original sense of such a commerce, which was actually more of the potlatsh type, a competition in giving, than like our competitions in taking.
D the peasants were acutely aware of their situation
False; The articles did not establish nor have a strong executive branch and they greatly circumscribed the role of courts.
<span>The correct answer is Clear-cutting for customer products. That is a process of cutting down every single tree in an area. The wood is then used for many things, from toothpicks to car interrior parts, to toys. However, this won't be able to go on forever since trees are cut down much faster than they are produced, so Canada is at a loss.</span>
