Answer:
1. Huprey can resonably estimate that a pending lawsuit will result in damages of $1,280,000, it is probable that Huprey will lose the case.
2. It is reasonably possible that Huprey will lose a pending lawsuit. The loss cannot be estimable.
3. Huprey is being sued for damages of $2,400,000. It is very unlikely (remote) that Huprey will lose the case.
Explanation:
Contingent liabilities must be recorded only when it is probable that the liability will happen and you can estimate the associated costs.
When contingent liabilities are only reasonably possible or you cannot estimate the amount, they must be included in the footnotes of the financial statements.
When contingent liabilities are not reasonably possible, nothing needs to be disclosed.
Answer:
$6000
Explanation:
Accordingly, the costs associated with throwing a party for employees and their families (spouses and significant others) are fully deductible (100%) as long as the party is hosted primarily for the employees. In this case, the party is for the employees as it is seen to benefits them, thus, total cost Donald can deduct equals cost of beverages and food plus cost of band,
That is,
= 5500 + 500
=$6000
Answer:
the cost of goods manufactured is $183,000
Explanation:
The computation of the cost of goods manufactured is shown below:
Cost of goods manufactured = Labor cost + direct material purchased + overhead cost - ending balance of material - ending balance of work in process
= $66,000 + $22,000 + $98,000 - $1,000 - $2,000
= $183,000
Hence, the cost of goods manufactured is $183,000
Answer:
$10
Explanation:
Steve achieved a producer surplus of $10, which is commensurate with the value of the 6-pack of beer he received from his neighbor. This means he practically sold the old surfboard for $10.
Answer:
B) plan 1 : worker earning y = x - 0.14 , unit labor = 
plan 2 : worker earning y = 0.5x + 0.5, unit labor = (0.5x + 0.5) / x
C) At 128%
D ) plan D IS PREFERABLE
Explanation:
In the first case Benefits are split : 30% to worker , 70% to company ( up to 120% ) performance
In the second case benefits 50% go to the worker and 50% go the company
B) The equations for worker earnings and normalized unit labor costs for each scheme
Plan 1 :
y ( percentage earning of worker ) = 1
unit labor cost = Y / 1
y = 0 - 30
unit labor = 0.3 / x
y = x - 0.14 therefore unit labor =
plan 2 :
y ( percentage earning of worker ) = 1, y = 0.5x + 0.5
unit labor cost : Y / 1 = (0.5x + 0.5) / x
C ) The point at which the two plans break even
0.5x + 0.5 = x - 0.14
0.5 + 0.14 = x - 0.5x
0.64 = x(1 - 0.5 )
x = 0.64 / 0.5 = 1.28 = 128%
D) The company would prefer plan 1
