Answer:
b. Critics of the government were murdered or imprisoned.
Explanation:
Here is an in-depth explanation for my answer. These have neither dates nor real evidence to back them up, so you will have to find any sources to back up my claims on your own. You're also free to disagree or edit my take of Stalin's totalitarianism; my aim here is just to give a starting point for you to build off of and make your own.
a. Peasants owned land that they could farm.
- Communism and really socialism as a whole brought forth an idea that there should be no privately owned land; any and all land was owned by the federal government, and people simply used it. So, even with little historical knowledge on Stalinism, we can assume this answer is incorrect.
b. Critics of the government were murdered or imprisoned.
- Under Stalinism, there was no room for critique of government. Any party leaders and any critics of Stalinism with goals set on exposing corruption and flaws in current Soviet society were later found dead or jailed, peasants were imprisoned and put into forced labor if they went against the state and also sometimes killed off if they were thought of as spies. In the end, Stalin attempted complete removal of any opposition he may have faced, and used fear tactics to control the Soviet Union as its dictator.
c. Voters could choose between candidates from two political parties.
- Voters could not find any candidats that weren't already killed off by Stalin, so there was no one to vote for other than Stalin himself. Sure, they could vote, but there wasn't a political party other than Stalin's that could grab the brainwashed public's vote.
d. The government set up a court system based on truth and justice.
- If there was a court system to be found in the Soviet Union at the time, it was so unnoteworthy it may as well have not existed in the first place. The "court system" under Stalin rule was basically just an extension of Stalin's power, and Stalin always made sure that any decision was made with his consent or with his consent in mind.
Answer: it’s A: in 1900, the western United States was more urbanized than the eastern United States.
Explanation:
The Emancipation Proclamation did not immediately free slaves, as the rebel states would obviously not follow the orders given by Lincoln.
Here are the true statements: -It most definitely changed the significance of the war, for after a long war, people were starting to question what they were even fighting for.
-It did not free slaves in southern held territory.
-It arguably did end the threat of English recognition of the Confederacy, and for an interesting reason. Beforehand, England had no issue with providing aid to the Confederacy. However, once Lincoln made the war also focused on slavery, it would not have looked good for England to openly support the Confederacy any more.
President Roosevelt portrays Nazi Germany and its allies, the Axis powers, in his speech as He stated that if the Axis ended the war, they would take over other adjacent continents as well as bring massive military and naval forces against the US. As a result, the Axis power posed a threat to American society, and hence to America. This is further explained below.
<h3>Who is
President Roosevelt?</h3>
Generally, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt served as the 32nd President of the United States.
In conclusion, Roosevelt describes Nazi Germany and its supporters as aggressors with a completely different political ideology than America's, which consisted of brutally dominating the world.
Read more about President Roosevelt
brainly.com/question/14014275
#SPJ1
