a) Proof by contradiction is different from traditional proof as it accepts a single example showing that a statement is false, instead of having the need to derive a general relationship for all input values.
b) The statement is true by contradiction as the sum of the measures is of 160º, and not 180º.
<h3>What are supplementary angles?</h3>
Two angles are called supplementary angles if the sum of their measures has a value of 180º.
The measures of the angles in this problem are given as follows:
Then the sum of the measures of this angles is given as follows:
90 + 70 = 160º.
Which is a different sum of 160º, confirming the statement that the angles are not supplementary by contradiction.
A similar problem, involving proof by contradiction and supplementary angles, is presented at brainly.com/question/28889480
#SPJ1
Y=-6(10)+15
y=-60+15
y=-45
y=-120+15
y=-105
range equals -105 to 45
3/4 x n=1......n equals 4/3.
In order for n to equal 1 you have to find a number that will make 3/4 a whole number after you multiply it. Usually in problems like these the answer is usually the fraction but flipped around. So 3/4 and 4/3....when you multiply the numerators you get 12 and when you multiply the denominator you get 12 so 12/12, which equals 1. hope that makes sense.
Ax=aw-z-y
divide by x
a=awx-z-y
a=awx-zy
It's the same as x^211 = 8^152
Simplify that equation. Find the 211th root of (8^152), and that is what x equals. If I remember logs correctly...
