1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Debora [2.8K]
3 years ago
5

What two elements of the United States’s legal system can be traced to Roman law? a.a trial by jury of one’s peers and the use o

f legal representation b.use of trial judges and the death penalty c.a trial by jury of one’s peers and double jeopardy d.the concept of guilty until proven innocent and trial by ordeal
History
1 answer:
igor_vitrenko [27]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

c.a trial by a jury of one’s peers and double jeopardy

Explanation:

The two elements of the United States’s legal system that can be traced to Roman law is "a trial by a jury of one’s peers and double jeopardy."

This is evident in the fact that in the Roman republic, the trial by a jury of one's peers is well established whereby citizens are judged by their fellow citizens rather than the Emperor or King.

Also, double jeopardy is established in roman law that a person declared acquittal by a judge in a criminal case is exempted from further proceedings under the same charges.

You might be interested in
In mid-1863 the Union gained control of the entire length of Mississippi River. What strategic advantage did this give the Union
Shalnov [3]

Answer: Some historians believe that the Mississippi River's control was a key factor that decided the victor in the war.

Explanation:

Statistics say that as many as 26 battles were fought around that strategic place during the civil war and countless smaller conflicts. Control of the Mississippi River was one of the key factors in the Civil War. After the Union gained control of the Mississippi River, it gained a huge strategic advantage. In the first place, it divided the Confederation into two parts, and since the communication was flowing along that river, communication with the Confederation was disabled. With this move, the Union also economically weakened the Confederation since there was a huge flow of goods along the river to be disabled. Thus the Confederation was economically in disarray.

5 0
3 years ago
Do earthquakes happen everyday or over time along plate boundaries like between Africa and South America?
xeze [42]

Answer: Since it is a pattern recorded over history, can you make predictions?

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Explain how you can gat involved im a local community structures​
Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer: go into the world.

Explanation: You can go out and explore your community structures.

7 0
3 years ago
Gawain 4.1 : Tanong ko, sagutin mo
VMariaS [17]

Answer:

<h2>photo NM ivhu up to you later on hi j very hvcfnmo</h2>
7 0
3 years ago
HELP ME PLEASE ASAP PLASSPALSPALSPLAPSLASP SKSKSSKS~!!!!!!!!!
Levart [38]

____________________________________________________

Answer:

Your answer would be D). Regional attitudes toward slavery decided the outcome.

____________________________________________________

The statement that accurately describes the results of the presidential election of 1860 is regional attitudes toward slavery decided the outcome.

____________________________________________________

Presidential election of 1860:

The presidential election of 1860 was a presidential election between Abraham Lincoln and John C. Breckinridge.

____________________________________________________

Explanation:

The reason why "Regional attitudes toward slavery decided the outcome" is the correct answer is because the election was pretty much based on people's belief in slavery. Slavery was the main factor that made the outcome of the presidential election. Abraham Lincoln did not like slavery, though he didn't want a war to occur just to abolish slavery. Lincoln and the Northern States (The states that were free) believed in abolishing slavery. On the other hand, John C. Breckinridge was for slavery, and believed that slavery was a thing that should be kept in the United States. Him and the Southern states (non-free states) all supported slavery. During the election, it was pretty much people's belief in slavery, and that made the outcome of Lincoln winning. More people supported Lincoln, which made him win the election by more than 50% of votes. To sum all of this information up, slavery was a key issue that made the outcome of the election.

____________________________________________________

Why the other answer choices are incorrect:

The reason why answer choice "Moderate voters who wanted a compromise on slavery determined the winner" is INCORRECT because:

People that agreed on slavery didn't have the choice to decide who the winner of the presidential election would be. The result of the election all determined on the amount of votes the candidates get.

The reason why answer choice "National unity led to a landslide victory for the Republican candidate" is INCORRECT because:

The National Unity wasn't formed to determine who would be the next president. A national unity is mostly formed because of a war. His party didn't make him win the election, it was all determined by the votes, since Lincoln was part of the National Union Party.

The reason why answer choice "Regional attitudes toward slavery played a small role in the outcome" is INCORRECT because:

Slavery played a HUGE role in the 1860 election. Slavery was not a small issue during their time, it was a BIG issue. The people that were voting for who they thought should be president determined their vote if they believed slavery was right or not. They didn't vote because of other things, they voted on their beliefs on slavery.

____________________________________________________

-Julie

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does article i section 32 of the texas constitution differ from the decision in the united states v. Windsor case?
    14·1 answer
  • What did the Soviet do during the cold war?
    7·1 answer
  • In three to four sentences, describe the negative effects multiculturalism has had on modern-day Egypt.
    6·1 answer
  • 10. What were the causes of the French Revolution of 1848?
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a key to the North winning the Civil War?
    8·2 answers
  • Who did not want to reconcile with the south?
    8·1 answer
  • 2. How did the completion of the transcontinental railroad change the face of<br> America?
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP FAST 50 PTS
    6·2 answers
  • which situation would be more likely to occur in the modern era than in other periods in human history
    15·1 answer
  • Why do you think the author claims that the Kansas-Nebraska Act was the most important event leading up to the Civil War? Do you
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!