Answer:
-11
Step-by-step explanation:
Plug in 0 for x and 3/5 for y into the expression
-4(0) + 5(3/5) - 14
Multiply the numbers inside the parentheses
0 + 3 - 14
3 - 14 = -11, which is your answer
Answer:
21 ways
Step-by-step explanation:
a, b, c, d, e, f, g, linda
1 2 linda
a__ b__ __
a__c __ __
a__d __ __
a__ e__ __
a__ f__ __
a__ g__ __
b__c __ __
b__d __ __
b__ e__ __
b__ f__ __
b__ g__ __
c__d __ __
c__ e__ __
c__ f__ __
c__ g__ __
d__ e__ __
d__ f__ __
d__ g__ __
e__ f__ __
e__ g__ __
f__ g__ __
count them
in total
there are
21 triples
Multiply the denominator by 4
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Answer:
45
Step-by-step explanation:
10+10+10+10+5=45
