Enormous O unpredictability is in reference to the most exceedingly terrible conceivable development rate of the calculation. So O(N log N) implies that it will never keep running in some time more terrible than O(N log N). So in spite of the fact that Al's calculation scales superior to Bob's quadratic algo, it doesn't really mean it is better for ALL info sizes.
Maybe there is critical overhead in building up it, for example, making a lot of clusters or factors. Remember that even an O(N log N) calculation could have 1000 non settled circles that official at O(N) and still be viewed as O(N log N) the length of it is the most exceedingly awful part.
I dont know the answer sorry follow me for a follow back
The aluminum sulfate stock solution should the chemist pour out is 219.8 ml
Complete Question
A chemist must prepare 400 mL of 1.00M aqueous aluminum sulfate working solution. He'll do this by pouring out 1.82 mol/L aqueous aluminum sulfate stock solution into a graduated cylinder and diluting it with distilled water. How many mL of the aluminum sulfate stock solution should the chemist pour out?
The aluminum sulfate stock solution should the chemist pour out is 219.8 ml
Given:
V1 = 400ml, M1 = 1 M, V2 = ?, M2 = 1.82 M
Hence, the relation between molarity and volume is as follows.
M1V1 = M2V2
1.00M x 400ml = 1.82 x V2
V₂ = 219.8 ml
Thus, we can conclude that 219.8 ml of the aluminum sulfate stock solution should the chemist pour out.
Learn more about Volume here:
brainly.com/question/25736513
#SPJ4