Answer:
It makes it impossible for criminals to do bad things over and over again. Executing someone permanently stops the worst criminals and means we can all feel safer, as they can't commit any more crimes. If they were in prison they might escape, or be let out for good behaviour.
Having a functional death penalty law will help us protect the public from society's worst criminals and bring some measure of closure to the families whose loved ones were cruelly taken from them.
”Introduction to capital punishment
Capital punishment is the practice of executing someone as punishment for a specific crime after a proper legal trial. It can only be used by a state, so when non-state organisations speak of having 'executed' a person they have actually committed a murder.
<h2>PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST..</h2>
Answer:
I will dscuss this onn this 3 points:
1. Confederation war
2. Secession from the south
3. Slavery
Explanation:
Abraham Lincoln, the 16th president of USA, was among the most respected presidents to have ruled the con federal state of USA. He ruled from 1861 until his assassination in 1865.
His victory at the poll was greeted with secession drive by the southern sates, whose major purpose of the secession demand was the fear of abolition of slave trade. He assured the Southern secessionists of his unwillingness to abolish slaver across America but supported law that will limit them within their immediate territories. Fall out from the agitation was the American civil war fought between the North and the South.
However, in his second term he signed the amendment to abolish slave trade in the United States. The abolition and the emancipation of slaves was later regarded as the goal of the Union war
After his ingratiation he was grappled with the civil war. There were demands from the states of the south for secession. He took permission from the congress to suspend the constitution in other to have upper hand to suppress the secession sympathizers from South. His second victory at polls gave him opportunity to further unite the union. He was later regarded as the saviour of the union.
Answer:
The first one is correct. The second one is a run-on sentence, like speaking without pausing at a comma to take a breath.
This question is worded awkwardly
A conflict in literature is defined as any struggle between opposing forces. Usually, the main character struggles against some other force. This type ofconflict is what drives each and every story. Without it, the story would have no point or purpose.
an internal conflict would be man vs. self meaning someone is struggling with an internal idea or thought
external could be man vs nature, man vs society, man vs man etc. these are all people vs outside forces
this is the first piece, i will add more once i have poems and stories to choose from
