Answer:
The benefits of trade agreements are not felt evenly by all industries in an economy. In fact, even member nations gain varying advantages by entering into trade agreements. However, despite these drawbacks, the United States continues to act on its commitment to free trade. In 2005, the United States signed a fair trade agreement (FTA) with Australia, and in 2012, it signed a trade protection agreement (TPA) with Colombia. Both agreements have been in force for a while. Now the question is, Have these agreements benefited the US economy? Let’s examine the impact of the bilateral agreements with Colombia and Australia on the US economy.
According to the USTR, the International Trade Commission (ITC) predicted that the United States–Colombia TPA would increase national GDP by $2.5 billion (Office of the US Trade Representative). Under the TPA, US exports to Colombia increased from $12.0 billion in 2010 to $18.3 billion in 2013 (US Department of State). The TPA seems to have delivered on its promise, because according to the USTR, US exports to Colombia increased by 30% in 2013 (Office of the US Trade Representative). So financially, Colombia is a lucrative market for the United States. However, the main opposition to the TPA stemmed from concerns about the terrible labor conditions in Colombia and the violent threats to those seeking to improve labor conditions in a country rife with crime. Although violence is a major concern, the FTA will eventually help both nations by bringing about social and labor reforms through economic activity. By helping Colombia become a peaceful country, the United States can pave the way for increased trade with Colombia in the future.
The United States–Australia FTA received considered opposition in both countries. US dairy farmers, ranchers, and small farmers were anxious about job losses resulting from the free entry of Australian products into the US market. However, if we judge by the boost in exports, the FTA has contributed to overall US economic growth. According to the USTR, in the first five years of the FTA, US exports to Australia increased by 33% (Office of the US Trade Representative). The FTA removed all tariffs on American imports into Australia, giving US exporters barrier-free entry into Australian markets.
The export industry plays a key role in driving economic growth and generating jobs in the United States. Colombia and Australia are two large and important markets for US exporters. The United States faces competition from other nations for access to these markets. By signing trade agreements, American goods can compete effectively in these markets. Although the agreements with Colombia and Australia are opposed for valid reasons, the agreements will benefit the US economy over time
Explanation:
Answer:
1. Made Texas a state in 1845: <u>United States</u>
2. Outlawed slavery by 1836: <u>Mexico</u>
3. Threatened war to reclaim Texas: <u>United States</u>
4. Offered to buy the Southwest: <u>United States</u>
5. Claimed the boundary 100 miles north of Rio Grande: <u>Mexico</u>
6. Allowed slavery in some states: <u>Mexico</u>
7. Ceded the Southwest after losing the war: <u>Mexico</u>
8. Claimed the boundary at Rio Grande: <u>United States</u>
9. Supported the Bear Flag Revolt: <u>United States</u>
Explanation:
The war between Mexico and the United States of America, also known as the First American Intervention in Mexico, which took place between 1846 and 1848, had as a consequence for Mexico the loss of approximately 2,378,540 square km of territory, and for the United States the annex of these lands.
Since the colonial era, the United States' claimed to acquire Alta California, New Mexico and Texas, was evident by sending various representatives of the US government to negotiate the borders with New Spain, in addition to trying to buy the territories before mentioned.
Hi,
Answer: B. The ability to control the actions of others
<u>My work:</u> Your answer would be B. The ability to control the actions of others, because Authority is defined as; the power to give orders over another. Your answer could also be A. But to bring it down to one it would be B. Because Power that is recognized as legitimate would be The Army, government, principle would all be examples!
I Hope I Helped!
Answer: Many decades earlier they had chosen a destiny alongside canada, rather than as a part of it.The tow countries adopted self government under the british crown.
His findings encouraged settlers to move to Texas
