Answer:
I disagree.
Explanation:
For many years the phrase "Seeing is believing" has been propagated as a way to question and verify the information that reaches us. "Seeing is believing" reflects an evidential thought, where something must be witnessed and touched to be credible. We cannot agree with that.
Agreeing with this phrase is a way of denying all the scientific and technological advances that humanity has gone through. This is because there are countless things that could be scientifically proven and that we cannot see, such as DNA, atoms, molecules, RNA, among others. Atoms, for example, were proven through scientific techniques and devices that were modernized and allowed us to reach a conclusion without being able to see the atoms, but knowing that they are real.
We must not be denialists, especially in scientific matters, because science is one of the main factors for the advancement of society, without scientific advancement there is no progress.
Therefore, we must motivate the phrase "Seeing is believing" to "Proving is believing", which is very rational and coherent.
First of all plants get their energy from the sun and Chlorophll collects it then the Chloroplast obtains it then they get their enrgy. So, If an insect eats a leaf it would of course obtain the plant's energy from the sun itself. Also, a plant is and insect main food source. (Hope this helps).
The relationship between them is oxygen because it is the place where the electrons go its the thing the is reduced
