1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergey [27]
3 years ago
7

Could you have legitimacy but not authority?

History
1 answer:
kotegsom [21]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: yes

Explanation:

Power is an entity's or individual's ability to control or direct others, while authority is influence that is predicated on perceived legitimacy. Consequently, power is necessary for authority, but it is possible to have power without authority. In other words, power is necessary but not sufficient for authority.

You might be interested in
Q1. Why did Thomas Jefferson oppose a large federal government?
crimeas [40]
He wanted to limit the Government because he believed that power should remain at the local level and with the people and he believed that a strong federal government would get too powerful and take away the rights of the people.
8 0
3 years ago
which of the following is a policy in which strong Nations control weaker countries or territories? jingoism federalism social D
tresset_1 [31]
I hope I can help! :)

The answer is Imperialism.

Have a great day/evening/night! :)
Let me know if you have any additional questions!
-Kappifilms
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Supreme Court has ruled on cases dealing with freedom of religion and all of the following EXCEPT which one?
Yuri [45]
The Supreme Court has ruled on cases dealing with freedom of religion and all of the following such as employment, public displays and military but not about professional sports games. This specific aspect is especially delegated to committees that are responsible for such events. 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which early explorer mistook the Canadian River for the Red River and abandoned his mission in 1820?
Levart [38]
A. Stephen h. Long
(Hope this helps)
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the four steps of a nonviolent campaign?
cricket20 [7]

Answer:

The four steps of a non-violent Campaign are:

1. Collection of the facts to determine whether injustices are alive

2. Negotiation

3. Self-purification

4. Direct action

Explanation:

The four steps of a non-violent campaign were laid down by the Martin Luther King Jr. which were based on the teaching of the philosopher Daniel Dennett.

The aim of a non-violent campaign is to bring about social change and stop injustice without taking up arms, damaging property or killing anyone.

Instead, the campaign uses civic society members and other lawful means in order to bring about negotiations.

Ghandhi is known for his non-violent campaigns against British rule in India, where he used a series of strikes and civil discourse to pressure the ruling government.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • did the Reconstruction period work? Did it solve the issues of slavery, segregation, and inequality? (and if u can make it into
    8·1 answer
  • Why are secondary sources often useful?
    10·1 answer
  • What did people cash in after World War I giving them extra money? (The roaring twenties)
    14·1 answer
  • What happens once a year when the snow on the mountain tops melts and flows down the mountain into the Nile River serving as one
    9·1 answer
  • Who was the first man that went to the moon?
    10·2 answers
  • About how many people died building the Great Wall of China?
    14·2 answers
  • - from Article V of The United States Constitution
    6·1 answer
  • The Vietcong were Communist rebels that moved throughout the jungle. *<br> true or false
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a cause of the pullman strike of 1894.
    15·2 answers
  • Name four (4) inventions (and their inventors) of the industrial revolution
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!