You didn't list choices, but I've seen a question like this before and the answer should be something like this:
- After World War I, the Allies imposed punishments that crippled Germany's economy and made it possible for Hitler to rise to power.
- After World War II, the Allies prevented Germany from buillding up its military (as they had tried to do after World War I also) ... but this time provided financial aid so the country could rebuild its economy.
Further details:
The Treaty of Versailles, which came out of the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, after World War I, was very punitive towards Germany. Germany was forced to admit responsibility for causing the Great War (World War I). We now call that "the war guilt" clause of the treaty. Germany also was forced to pay large reparation payments to the Allies (who opposed Germany in the war). The German economy and national pride were deeply wounded -- and the Great Depression made things worse. The bad situation in Germany made it possible for a radical leader like Hitler, making all sorts of bold promises, to win over enough people to rise to power.
In the aftermath of World War II, the Allies took a different approach. The Marshall Plan (as it was called) was a $15 billion "European Recovery Program" that helped rebuild Germany and Western Europe after the war. The economic aid program was named after its chief architect, US Secretary of State George Marshall.
Answer:
With the help of many people, history writing has progressed significantly over time. In the modern context, it can be traced back to the historians Herodotus and Sima Qian of ancient Greece and China, who started keeping records of human life. Despite the fact that they were not the first people to write history, they are collectively referred to as the first great historians of the Western and Eastern worlds because of their individual inventions and thorough work that has shaped history writing to this day. When it comes to the greatness of these ancient historians, there is much controversy, and some claim they were both significant and successful in their work.
Explanation:
I found that...
States being able to issue their own paper money would lead to problems such as counterfeiting and people not being able to use money from a certain state in a different state.
