The solution of the equation is x = 71 / 36.
<h3>How to solve an equation with one variable</h3>
Herein we have an equation with several rational constants and only one variable, x, which has to be cleared by using algebra procedures. The procedure is shown below:
2 · x + 1 / 3 + x - 1 / 4 = 13 / 2 Given
2 · x + x = 13 / 2 - 1 / 3 - 1 / 4 Compatibility with addition / Existence of additive inverse / Modulative property
3 · x = 71 / 12 Definitions of addition and subtraction / Distributive property
x = 71 / 36 Compatibility with multiplication / Existence of multiplicative inverse / Modulative property / Result
The solution of the equation is x = 71 / 36.
To learn more on equations: brainly.com/question/10413253
#SPJ1
Answer:
Og(x) is shifted 4 units left and 6 units down from f(x).
Step-by-step explanation:
To understand how the parent function is transformed, you have to look at a few things.
Firstly, is there a negative sign in front? If there is, then the function is flipped around the y-axis
Second, on the part where the x is included (in this case it is x+4) you have to see if there is a negative sign in front of this. If this is the case, then the formula is flipped around the x-axis
<em>Third, If the part with the x is being added to, then the graph is being translated to the left that many units. If it is being subtracted from, then it is being translated to the right that many units (in this case it is </em><u><em>x+4</em></u><em>, so we move to the left 4 units) ((it is the opposite of what would be common sense, I know))</em>
<em>Lastly, if the whole thing is being added to, move up that many units. If it is subtracted from, move down that many units (in this case it is 1/x+4 </em><u><em>- 6)</em></u><em> (( this one does follow common sense))</em>
There are other factors, such as leading coefficients (on just the x part or the whole thing) and other stuff I'm sure I don't remember )
For more information: https://mathhints.com/parent-graphs-and-transformations/
Answer:
Am am not that big brain
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
the right answer is 25 thats all u need to type in keep up the good work
Step-by-step explanation:
After plotting the data from the table, with the number of times sick per year as a function of the number of apples eaten per week, I can conclude that there is no definite correlation between the two variables. This is because the data points do not have a good fit with any trend, meaning the R-squared value is low. Thus, the number of apples eaten per week has no significant effect on the number of times the people listed get sick per year.
