The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can comment on the following.
Some limitations that historians studying Mesoamerican cultures face when trying to get information is that these Mesoamerican civilizations such as the Aztecs, the Toltecs, the Olmecs, the Mayas, or the Zapotecs registered their stories and events in the form of "codices," which are a series of drawings or pictographs that are not easy to understand or to translate.
In the case of the Mayas, just a little bit is known about them because anthropologists and archeologists haven't been able to understand and translate their codices and teh Mayan stelae.
These Mesoamerican civilizations did not have an alphabet as we know it today. They sculped and craved in stones a series of codices, figures, and representations that must be translated and interpreted.
Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
Answer:
He led a revolutionary war to winning
Explanation:
