Question

The Sixth Amendment was interpreted in

Answer 1

The Sixth Amendment was interpreted in :

 Gideon v. Wainwright to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights

Gideon v. Wainwright to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it

Miranda v. Arizona to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights

Miranda v. Arizona to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it.

If this is your question as mine was, the answer is B. Gideon v. Wainwright to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it.

6th Amendment protects right to counsel.

However, 5th amendment is the one to protect the right to be told your rights- for it protects of self-incrimination as well. And that is what the Miranda v. Arizona case concluded.

Answer 2

The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution has been interpreted in many supreme court cases, since it states the requirements of due process that many people convicted of crimes are often denied.