<u>Answer:</u>
No, the government under the Constitution does not have that ability now.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- The early governments that were not bound by established rules could implement new decisions through their own conscience every other day.
- Such governments had given themselves the ability to conduct governance the way they thought was right for society.
- In other words, they had the ability to govern the governed without the consent of governed.
- This undue ability of the governments got limitations as the Constitution came into being.
Answer:
Right choice:
2. The Monroe Doctrine permits the United States to intervene actively in the affairs of Latin American nations.
Explanation:
Theodore Roosevelt´s actions and policy in Latin America are known as the "big stick" because he actively intervened in the affairs of Caribbean and Latin American nations. He supported the movement that proclaimed Panamanian independence from Colombia because it facilitated the contruction of the canal. His administration also acted to make sure regional countries pay their debts to foreign creditors, fearing European intervention using that as a pretext. The regional foreign policy of Roosevelt is also defined as the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine.
Well you can certaily say that his assassination was the key reason which sparked the war, however, there were tensions going on before his assassination. On the Balkans there had been very strong desire for independence from the various nations which lived there, there was general unsatisfaction coming from Germany about its status with colonies, etc.
Answer:
India
Explanation:
In August 1920, he urged Indians to withdraw their children from British-run schools, boycott the law courts, quit their colonial government jobs, and continue to refuse to buy imported cloth. Now called "Mahatma," meaning "Great Soul," Gandhi spoke to large crowds throughout the country.
<span>"Large numbers started heading West, and territories like Kansas and Nebraska began to acquire signficance as future states of the Union. This provoked a heated debate as to whether they would be slave-states or free soil."</span>
