the answer is D. hope it helps.
Auden's poem called "Musee des beaux arts" and Brueghel's painting: "Landscape with the fall of Icarus" both address human kind's indifference to suffering. I think the painting creates a more powerful emotional response in the viewer than the poem. In the painting the farmer continues to plow while Icarus is falling, something completely out of the ordinary is happening, Icarus symbolizes human failure and the impossibility to fly, which definitely brings suffering, but the farmer continues working. You can clearly see the farmer's indifference, he is even facing backwards, the viewer cannot see his expression since he is facing backwards. The painting is very powerful, since you must pay attention to detail to understand it, it is surprising once you understand that the image of Icarus symbolizes failure and suffering, it is a very important mythological event but nobody seems to be paying attention to it. While reading the poem, I felt it was much more rational and did not show the farmer's indifference, it does not involve the reader in the way the painting involves the viewer.
Answer:
I am profoundly apologetic
Explanation:
for my wrong behavior
Answer:
the last time i suprised myself is when i ws at school and i for somee reason got surprised
Explanation:
Answer: “He looked round, but could see nothing but a crow winging its solitary flight across the mountain“
“ when he heard the same cry ring through the still evening air: “Rip Van Winkle! Rip Van Winkle!””
“ and perceived a strange figure slowly toiling up the rocks, and bending under the weight of something he carried on his back”
Explanation: all of these sentences give you a brief description of where and when this is happening.