What are the strongest three arguments that support Kaepernick’s decision to kneel during the national anthem?

History

1 answer:

Rus_ich [418]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The current debate over kneeling or sitting in protest during the national anthem was ignited by Colin Kaepernick in 2016 and has escalated to become a nationally divisive issue. San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick first refused to stand during “The Star-Spangled Banner” on Aug. 26, 2016 to protest racial injustice and police brutality in the United States. Since that time, many other professional football players, [7] high school athletes, and [8] professional athletes in other sports [9] have refused to stand for the national anthem. These protests have generated controversy and sparked a public conversation about the protesters’ messages and how they’ve chosen to deliver them.

Colin Kaepernick (in number seven jersey) and teammate Eric Reid kneel during the national anthem on Sep. 1, 2016.

Source: Josh Levin, “Colin Kaepernick’s Protest Is Working,”

You might be interested in

PLZZZZZZZZ HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

noname [10]

Answer:

i believe it is (TO ACHIEVE MOKSHA AND FREE YOUR SOUL FROM THE CYCLE OF REINCARNATION

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which diagram most accurately explains changes in media over time?

Sindrei [870]

Answer:

Explanation:

Because im John Constantine. thats all you need to know.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

When the allstons returned to their plantation at the end of the civil war, they were unable to regain control of their property

irina1246 [14]

When the allstons returned to their plantation at the end of the civil war, they were unable to regain control of their property from the freed slaves because <span>new relationships would have to be established with their former slaves.</span>

7 0

3 years ago

Which statement is true of the sedition act

Furkat [3]

Answer:

I would say D as well.

Explanation:

The Sedition Act permitted the deportation, fine, or imprisonment of anyone deemed a threat to the government of the United States. This means opponents of war could be deported, fined, or imprisioned if they are thought to be a threat to the United States government.

6 0

3 years ago

Was the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act of 1923 good for Native Hawaiians?

tangare [24]

Answer:

Yes it was

Explanation:

The answer is yes, it was good for Hawaiians. The United States legislature enacted the hawaiian homes commission act to see that the Hawaiians are protected and also to see that the lives of native hawaiians are improved. Public lands were administered and given for homesteads. This was a rehabilitation program for the people.

8 0

3 years ago