Clarence Darrow was a <span>country lawyer from Ashtabula, Ohio, who argued that criminals are not born. He believes that criminals are made by the unjust condition of human life</span>
Stocks directly affected only 4 million out of 120 million people. Indirectly:
-Risky loans hurt banks
-Consumer borrowing
-Bank runs
-Bank failures
-Savings wiped out (Banks failures wiped out peoples saving)
-Cuts in production
-Rise in unemployment
-Further cuts in production
Answer:
Slaves were property
Explanation:
Slaves were essentially property, worth money and were used for extremely cheap labor. Killing the slave would essentially be purposely crashing your car. That is why slavers practiced cruel punishments such as beatings to discipline disobedient slaves.
Answer:
Explanation:
I don't see how this is possible, but the answer seems to be A which is the only answer that makes sense.
Large tax cuts don't have anything to do with supply of goods. It does help consumption but that is not the same thing as supply side economics.
C is much truer for the aftermath of WWI than a general statement about Supply. I don't think it is the right answer.
It didn't call for increased government spending unless the government wanted the goods being produced.
I think I'd go with A. It is the most straight forward.
Answer:George Washington
Explanation:George Washington (1732-99) was commander in chief of the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War (1775-83) and served two terms as the first U.S. president, from 1789 to 1797.
