In a series of Supreme Court rulings under Chief Justice Earl Warren, beginning with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, "separate but equal" facilities were found to be unconstitutional because new research demonstrated that separating students by "race" was detrimental to them, even if facilities were equal.
<h3>Which Supreme Court decision caused the separate but equal concept to be abolished?</h3>
- The separate but equal theory was abolished as a result of the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court ruling.
- The 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. Board of Education, which overturned the "separate but equal" principle and ordered an end to school segregation, is one of the most well-known decisions to come out of this time period.
- "Separate but equal" facilities were found to be unconstitutional in a series of Supreme Court decisions made under Chief Justice Earl Warren, starting with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, because new research showed that dividing students by "race" was harmful to them even if facilities were equal.
- "Separate but equal" facilities were found to be unconstitutional in a series of Supreme Court decisions made under Chief Justice Earl Warren, starting with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, because new research showed that dividing students by "race" was harmful to them even if facilities were equal.
To learn more about the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court, refer to the following link:
brainly.com/question/9822748
#SPJ4
I believe the answer is: <span>. A. Islamic expansion into India was facilitated by both Islamic merchants and conquerors.
Cultural assimilation happened when both these merchants and conquerors conducted their business on foreign land.
For merchants, they spread muslim teachings through networking and building partnership with foreign people. As for conquerors, they usually legally require the people that they conquered to follow the empire's official muslim religion.</span>
<span>These birds migrate winters in Canada it snows alot their and starts early so the birds go south to find foods water to bath in and swim since most the water sources freeze solid in Canada
hope this helps</span>
According to Merton's typology of prejudice and discrimination, Xavier is an unprejudiced nondiscriminator, whereas Reuben is a prejudiced nondiscriminator.
<h3>Unprejudiced vs. Prejudiced</h3>
Xavier and Reuben cannot be accused of discrimination of African Americans since they both accept them in their chess club. However, there is a big difference between Xavier and Reuben, even if their behavior is the same.
Xavier truly believes African Americans are as intelligent as white Americans, which means he is unprejudiced. Reuben, on the other hand, does not hold the same belief. He is prejudiced against African Americans, thinking they have weak cognitive abilities.
Therefore, even though both can be considered nondiscriminators, Xavier is unprejudiced, whereas Reuben is prejudiced.
Learn more about nondiscriminators here:
brainly.com/question/13782165
#SPJ12
Prior to the arrival of the first Europeans in North America, millions of Native Americans lived in scattered and diverse settlements across the continent. By 1492, at least 375 distinct languages were spoken and societies were structured in many ways. False. SOME tribes were nomadic while others were more permanent
