The last one.
Explanation: Parents usually see screen time as dangerous and people are able to market off protection and VPNs and other things such as family link and screen-time on apple and go_gle. They try to cut off your apps and stuff but if they show the dangers, it usually makes money for a certain other protection app/site/subscription worth lots of money, It's really effective. Parents also think people online change children behaviour, like if they hang out around someone whos a bad influence and imprint on them and act like them. Or hanging out with a younger person and they act like that age. Same goes for online people or adults, They don't know the people their children/teenagers are hanging out with so again, most likely the last one.
IF NOT possibly the second to last.
IF wrong let me know, i'll change it, lol
Well that's true because when the slave holders get new slaves or sell slaves they act like animals and the slaves are treated LIKE animals and that's wrong. I hope this helps.
It would be much better if there was a context representing the idea which has to be determined. But 'whom' actually can pose as an object in the sentence, only when it is <span>objective case.</span>
