Answer:
No, the court would not have been so lenient with her.
Explanation:
Whether or not Carmela was passive in the situation or she was only guiding her father on how to go about the lawsuit, the court has every right and would have included her in the lawsuit with her father. This is so because her father and she would have been included in the lawsuit in default. Hence, it is not a matter of decency or not, but a matter of what is supposed to be.
Explanation:
it has become less restricted over time.
Answer:
B Perceived acquisition of their interest
Explanation:
Answer:
because they need more protection over the women
Explanation:
<span>Psychologist robert kastenbaum points out that kübler-ross' theory neglects: "certain aspects of the dying process".
Kastenbaum's Trajectories of Death Psychologist Robert Kastenbaum (1975) brings up that in spite of the fact that Kiibler-Ross' hypothesis has justify, it dismisses certain parts of the dying procedure. A standout amongst the most imperative is simply the idea of the malady, which by and large decides torment, mobility, the length of the terminal time frame.
</span>