Have you ever bought something you thought would make you happy, but in the end it didn't?

Computing absorption cost per unit and variable cost per unit Adamson, Inc. has the following cost data for Product X:

zvonat [6]

Answer:

unit cost for 2,000 units=$115

unit cost for 2,500 units =$113

unit cost for 5,000 units= $109

Explanation:

Absorption costing is method of costing where overheads are charged to units produced using volume-based bases. e.g machine hours, labour hours e.t.c. Units are valued using full cost per unit

Full cost per unit= Direct material cost + direct labor cost + Variable production overhead + Fixed production overhead

Fixed production overhead = Budgeted overhead/Budgeted production units

unit cost for 2,000 units

unit cost = 41 + 57 + 7 + (20,000/2000) = $115

unit cost for 2,500 units

unit cost = 41 + 57 + 7 + (20,000/2,500)= $113

unit cost for 5,000 units

unit cost = 41 + 57 + 7 + (20,000/5,000) = $109

unit cost for 2,000 units=$115

unit cost for 2,500 units =$113

unit cost for 5,000 units= $109

7 0

4 years ago

There are three components to dr. juran's process improvement strategy, known as the _____________ : planning, control, and impr

alukav5142 [94]

Wow, someone talking about Dr. Juran. In my career I was able to actually attend a conference of which he was the main attraction. Not sure if your statement requires an answer besides, true or false.
Hope you find some real good info below about him and his focus. It wasn't MONEY.

The Juran trilogy:

Juran was one of the first to write about the cost of poor quality. This was illustrated by his "Juran trilogy," an approach to cross-functional management, which is composed of three managerial processes: quality planning, quality control, and quality improvement. Without change, there will be a constant waste; during change there will be increased costs, but after the improvement, margins will be higher and the increased costs are recouped.

6 0

3 years ago

Mr Store who runs his photocopy business working 8 hours per day process 100 scripts. He estimates his labour cost to be € 9 per

nordsb [41]

Answer:

A) 0.33 scripts per euro

B) The new productivity is worse than the old productivity

C) 0.333 euros per script

Explanation:

number of hours worked per day = 8

number of scripts processed per day = 100

Labor cost per hour = 9 euros

Total labor cost per day = 9 * 8 = 72 euros

material cost per script = 2 euros

Total material cost per day = 2 * 100 = 200 euros

daily expenses = 28 euros

A) Calculate the multifactor productivity

= output / Total cost

Total cost = ( 72 + 200 + 28 ) = 300

= 100 / 300

= 0.33 scripts per euro

B ) compare the old and new productivity

Old productivity = 0.33 scripts / euro

new multifactor productivity

= output / Total cost

Total cost = (8*9)+(150*2.5)+28 = 475

= 150 / 475

= 0.3158 scripts per euro

hence the new productivity is worse than the old productivity

C ) using the initial multifactor productivity of 0.333

calculate the target total cost = output / multifactor of productivity

= 150/0.333

= 450 euros

hence Material cost = (450 - 8*9-28)/150

= 2.33 euro per script

So, the material cost will be increased by = 2.33 euros - 2

euros

= 0.333 euros per script

7 0

3 years ago

Mean for in grouped data

liubo4ka [24]

Answer:

To calculate the mean of grouped data, the first step is to determine the midpoint of each interval or class. These midpoints must then be multiplied by the frequencies of the corresponding classes. The sum of the products divided by the total number of values will be the value of the mean.

3 0

3 years ago

An engineering student decides to invest $4,000 into a few aggressive stocks. Three years later the student sells the stocks for

const2013 [10]

Answer:

a 26%

Explanation:

The computation of the annual rate of return on this investment is as follows:

Let us assume n be no of years

Now

The Annual rate of return is

= (Ending value ÷ beginning value)^1 ÷ n - 1

= ($8,000 ÷ $4000)^1 ÷ 3 - 1

= 0.2599

= 25.99 %

= 26%

hence, the annual rate of return is 26%

Therefore the correct option is a.

We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come

And, the same is to be considered

4 0

3 years ago