Where are the options? I don’t see any options :( sorry I can’t answer your question.
The answer is A. World War I. Japan grew during this time. Their economy flourished. They have started to expand their business and became an industrial nation. They were able to provide more materials for their factories.They pressured China by giving their 21 demands. They saw the war as an opportunity.
Answer:
i hope this helps :) and pls mark as brainliest
Explanation:
A
Answer:
Student responses will vary. Students should mention both opportunities and challenges of farmers discussed in the lectures. Farmers were drawn to the availability of cheap land. The railroad also made it easier for farmers to transport needed supplies such as farming equipment, and it made it easier and faster for them to get their goods to market. With the rapid increase in the number of new settlements, there was plenty of business to be had. On the other hand, there were some drawbacks. First, the land was very dry, and many farmers, like one from Tennessee, had little experience working this type of soil. They were quick to adapt, however. They rerouted various water supplies and used dry farming techniques that proved successful. A second challenge facing everyone on the frontier, not just farmers, was the anger and hostility of some Native American tribes who threatened and raided settlements.
Explanation:
i took the test and got an 100, hope this helps
<u>Answer:</u>
Judicial review is the power of the Judicial Branch to review laws, Executive orders, and Executive acts to ensure they are Constitutional and are not in conflict with higher authorities.
Option: (A)
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Judicial review ensures that the laws made by legislative and executed by executive doesn’t violate the terms of a constitution.
- Judicial review is one among the "balances" and "checks" in separation of power.
- Judicial review supervises legislative and executive to form laws that doesn’t conflicts with the 'constitution'.
- Judicial review invalids the laws that violates the 'terms of a constitution'.