1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MrRa [10]
2 years ago
13

Should war have rules or restrictions to follow or should soldiers do whatever they need to

History
1 answer:
rusak2 [61]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

War should have rules and regulations to follow because if not the soldiers might not focus on their task.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What was roosevelt's agenda at the yalta conference ?
s344n2d4d5 [400]

Answer:

Each leader had an agenda for the Yalta Conference: Roosevelt wanted Soviet support in the U.S. Pacific War against Japan, specifically for the planned invasion of Japan , as well as Soviet participation in the UN Churchill pressed for free elections and democratic governments in Eastern and

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did humanism impact the literature during the renaissance?
weeeeeb [17]
It helped them understand things that helped their literature. 
6 0
3 years ago
Napoleon rule made Europeans love France and end any desire they had to rule themselves. it deprived them of a unified code law
salantis [7]
FALSE

Napoleon brought the Civil Code that had been implemented in France to the territories he conquered, bringing them also under those laws.  He also redivided territories he conquered according to his own administrative boundaries rather than their traditional boundaries.  His conquest and administration elsewhere in Europe bred contempt for him and for France, and the nations of Europe kept working to defeat him.  
5 0
4 years ago
Which of the following is TRUE about Supreme Court justices? A. They are the country’s foremost authorities on state constitutio
Luda [366]

The correct answer is:

<h2>C. They are the country's foremost authorities on the Constitution.</h2>

Answer A is incorrect.  Each state has its own Supreme Court for that purpose.

Answer B is incorrect.  In some cases, where there has been an even number of justices on the court, review of a case may end in a split decision.  When a split decision occurs, then the Supreme Court's action (or lack of action, we could say) doesn't establish any legal precedent in the matter.

Answer D is incorrect.  The Chief Justice and Associate Justices all serve for life or until resignation.   There are no "temporary" justices.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Anti-federalists believed that a bill of rights was unnecessary
Arada [10]

Answer:

Either A or B

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the nature of the government in Roman empire
    9·1 answer
  • Throughout most of the war, Lincoln believed that emancipation had to be coupled with
    8·2 answers
  • A system of beliefs or ideas that justifies the social, moral, religious, political, or economic interests held by a group or by
    5·2 answers
  • Dr. Michael DeBakey is best known for his contributions in the field of —
    10·1 answer
  • Why do constellations often have myths associated with them?
    9·1 answer
  • What primary areas did president Johnson's great society seek to address?
    5·1 answer
  • What is beneficial about having committees in the House of Representatives?
    15·1 answer
  • In what way did the women's role in the workforce change in WWII?
    5·1 answer
  • Please Help Asap!!! I will mark brainliest for the best answer!
    8·1 answer
  • Explain the steps of the legislative process
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!