From the following sentences," It didn't matter with whom, but Bette was determined to go to the theater." uses whom correctly
The other options use the word whom incorrectly, but option c does not because whom is correctly used in the sentence!
When referring to the object of a verb or preposition, whom should be used. When in doubt, try this simple trick: if the word can be replaced with "he" or "she," use who. Use whom if you can replace it with "him" or "her."
When referring to the subject of a sentence, who should be used.
When referring to the object of a verb or preposition, whom should be used.
How to Remember the Distinction?
Knowing the difference between subjective and objective cases is essential for understanding when to use "whom" or "who." You will be able to determine the correct usage of "who" and "whom" once you can easily identify the subject and object of a sentence or clause.
To practice more from Which sentence uses whom correctly, visit
brainly.com/question/9020062
#SPJ1
No The Gettysburg Address is not a metaphor.
<h2>Answer:</h2><h3> Tittle: Reduce Pollution</h3>
I am Seema And I am here to give u some safety measures and also how u should protect our planet Earth from pollution.
<h3> <em><u>Safety </u></em><em><u>Measures</u></em><em><u>:</u></em></h3>
To save our planet from more pollution we have to act smarter and give some attention towards our planet
Protecting our planet starts with you. Here are just a few of the things you can do.
Ten Simple Things You Can Do to Help Protect the Earth
Reduce, reuse, and recycle. Cut down on what you throw away. Follow the three "R's" to conserve natural resources and landfill space.
Volunteer. Volunteer for cleanups in your community. You can get involved in protecting your watershed, too.
Educate. When you further your own education, you can help others understand the importance and value of Ur Planet.
I guess this would help a little now? what say if it do help then mark as brainliest. :)
Yes, the boys are fearing the unknown rather then the beast.
Also No, because they are not sure if the beast exists. The beast is depicted differently to everyone.
Answer: Destroying food resources is more damaging than the use of weapons.
Explanation:
In the aforementioned article, the author explains how using starvation and food insecurity as weapons of war by destroying food resources, can be more damaging than the use of weapons.
Destroying food resources can threaten entire populations as they may starve to death while weapons cannot regularly do so. For instance, Germany could have implemented food destruction policies in WWII that would have killed 20 million Russians and the starvation of Biafra by the Nigerian government during the Biafran war killed many times more Biafrans by the armed conflict did.
