Answer: a. She will have problems with intimacy.
Explanation:
Erik Erikson was a psychologist who developed the Theory of Psychosocial Development which aimed to show how humans developed in life.
In the 5th stage known as <em>Identity versus confusion</em>, the human passes through adolescence. Here is where things are quite confusing as the person tries to navigate who they are with a lot of outside influence from family, friends or society in general bearing in on them. With all these influences, it is important that one develops a strong sense of personal identity for the next stage being young adulthood.
The Young Adulthood stage of life is the next stage and is known as the <em>Intimacy versus isolation</em> stage. At this stage, the major focus is forming intimate, loving relationships with people. A person who like the young woman in the question, fails to develop a strong sense of personal identity will find themselves having problems with developing intimacy with people as they will constantly doubt themselves and avoid people because of it leading to them having less committed relationships.
States should continue to allow ballot initiatives and other forms of direct democracy as it empowers the people to enact aws and make amendments.
<h3>What is democracy?</h3>
It should be noted that democracy simply means a system of government where the people choose their leaders.
In this case, states should continue to allow ballot initiatives and other forms of direct democracy as it empowers the people to enact aws and make amendments.
Learn more about democracy on:
brainly.com/question/3710021
#SPJ1
<span>
Unity is the appearance or condition of oneness in a work of art.
Unity in art refers to the phenomenon when one element in a work of art is connected to another element or elements. Unity in art makes it wholesome, harmonious and pleasing to the eye. Unity in a work of art makes the viewer perceive it holistically rather than focusing on individual details. Attached are two examples of unity in artwork.
</span><span>
</span>
The Appointments Clause [of Article II] clearly implies a power of the Senate to give advice on and, if it chooses to do so, to consent to a nomination, but it says nothing about how the Senate should go about exercising that power. The text of the Constitution thus leaves the Senate free to exercise that power however it sees fit. Throughout American history, the Senate has frequently – surely, thousands of times – exercised its power over nominations by declining to act on them.
Answer:
incorporation of the Bill of Rights
Hope this helps!
