A theodicy for some given fact about evil is an explanation for why God would have an all‐things‐considered sufficient reason to allow that evil. The counterpart theodicy relies on a metaphysical claim about existence. We cannot know what "good" is unless there is "evil" to contrast it with. (1) Doesn't justify all kinds of evil (Do we need genocide to know what goodness is?), (2) Doesn't justify the amount of evil (Do we need so much killing/theft to know what goodness is?), (3) God can know good/evil prior to creation/evil.
Answer: Yes
Explanation:
A person with social style, understand the society and how to relate with people, this type of person can easily understand what the other person understands ,the pain point and what drives there needs, such person will be good at selling because the necessary skill to attract people is there 100% compared to a person with driver or expressive, here the express type only understand expression but he needs that social skill to get people to expresses too, so he can't be better at selling as the social interaction skill is absent .
Answer and Explanation:
At the point when biological species moves from its local area to an all the more remotely found area or an area of various condition, it experiences mutational changes with course of adjustment to the new condition. This causes age of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the different loci of these species.
According to the information, the species of sparrow was native to Alaska but first moved to North America and then to South America through Central America. Since all these three geographical locations have very stringently different environmental conditions, the species of sparrow must have underwent acclimatization followed by adaptive changes leading to permanent alterations in its genome.
Hence, it is very likely that the native species from Alaska will have a very different phenotype as compared to that of the species now residing at all three places.
Conversely, since the environmental conditions of central and north America are somewhat comparable in nature, the species of sparrows in these areas will have least number of differences with respect to their genetic loci.
For the answer to the question above, <span>A language is considered dead if it isn't spoken by a group of people anywhere in the world as a dominant form of communication. Latin can be learned but it's not a language that people socialize in anymore. It's really only a language of the Church and even academia.
</span><span>Classical Greek and the Greek before Classical as well as Koine Greek is all dead. People don't speak it or read it anymore except in academia. A modern Greek would not be able to understand Classical Greek just as we who know English can't understand Old English without learning it. Latin evolved into Italian. An Italian could not understand Latin without taking courses in it. But I think personally there is no such thing as a dead Language. As long as texts from the language survive and there are people who can read them a language lives.</span>
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
The food chain is as follows -
grass -> aphids (small grazing insects) -> ladybugs (carnivorous beetles) -> toads -> snakes
The grass is the primary producer while the snake is the tertiary consumer.
Grass is consumed by grazing insects, which is then consumed by carnivorous beetles. Carnivorous beetles is eaten by toads which is turn is fed upon by snake.
Hence, option B is correct
