Explanation: When you are reading from an third person omniscient POV you get to know everything, whilst in first person limited you will only know that characters POV
This is an interesting statement. Lets break it down sentence by sentence then get the whole message. First, we all do better when we work together. Teams can get work done faster because more heads are contributing. Then we have, our differences do matter but our common humanity matters more. This means that we do have our differences but we are all working together on a common goal. Now putting the two sentences together, the quotation is trying to say that people in general work together better in order to get a certain goal that everyone is working on done. The differences should not be a hindrance to reaching a goal because the goal is more important and more crucial than the differences of the participants.
This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Read the Address to Congress on Women's Suffrage
By Carrie Chapman Catt
1917
PART A: What does the word “impregnable” mean as it is used in paragraph 2?
A. Difficult to defeat or break from
B. Prone to radical change
C. Focused on the welfare of its people
D. Set in its ways; comfortable
2. PART B: Which phrase provides the best support for the answer to Part A?
A. “of revolution, of rebellion”
B. "so securely entrenched”
C. “customs and traditions”
D. “human society”
Answer:
A. Difficult to defeat or break from
B. "so securely entrenched”
Explanation:
The word “impregnable” as used in this case refers to something being difficult to be captured or broken into. In this example, that word is used to describe the seemingly unbreakable subordination of the colonies before the American Revolution, which history has proven was only an obstacle plausible of being surpassed, just like woman suffrage is.
