I’m so confused. what am i answering
Answer:
The ironic part is where it says "thought we were going to have to get on without you, tessie"
Explanation:
This only becomes ironic after the reader has finished with the story and can understand what has happened because at the end Tessie "wins" the lottery.
Answer:
Olsen's story takes place in the most ordinary of settings: a mother, at home, ironing. As the story develops, this generic setting starts to take on specific characteristics. It is focused on a working class home in the 1950's in America. During the Depression years, many single, working mothers struggled with a lack of social services and financial support. Looking at the mere title of this story conveys the dullness in the lives of women in america at the time. The historical context of the story sets an orthodox tone, and a basis for a stirring revolution to bring liveliness into the lives of women during the great depression.
Explanation:
Answer:
a) me
Explanation:
When Marty and I came home from school, we were shocked. There were streamers, and people, and gifts, and it was a huge surprise. The party was for my brother and <u>me</u>. Hence, the option (a) is the correct answer.
<span>30) The function of the word flocking as it is used in this sentence is shown here:
D) It is called a participle and it functions as an adjective in this sentence.The sentence stands as a nice example of how participle phrase adds description to the sentence. The media specialist smiled when he saw the eager students flocking <span>to the area with the latest bestsellers. The highlighted part of the sentence contains objects and modifiers that completes the thought which is a direct characteristic of a participle.</span></span>
