Answer:
the Three-Fifths Compromise vs. the Great Compromise
Explanation:
When the Articles of Confederation underwent revision, there were many issues that were discussed. One of the major issues was the debate over the the Three-Fifths Compromise vs. the Great Compromise. According to the Great Compromise, an equal right was to be distributed among the citizens to choose the representatives.
In the Three-Fifths Compromise, no debates were initiated on the issue of the complete abolition of slavery and granting them the citizenship. The slaves were agreed to be counted to be the three-fifth of the individual who were liable for taxation and representation.
Answer:
To profit and trade.
Explanation:
For a variety of reasons, the British desired an empire. To begin with, the discovery of the New World allowed for the accumulation of wealth. Metals and minerals abound in the Americas, and the English, then British, were keen to take use of them. The large open regions present in the Americas also allowed for expansion. This might be utilized to relieve land strain at home, be farmed for items needed in Britain, and serve as a trading post on the route to the Far East, hopefully. Trade was a major driving force. The East India Company and the Royal African Company were founded as a result of a lack of profit.
D. A historian reads a journal entry by a pilgrim.
Answer:
Richard Nixon, 37th president of the United States (1969–74), who, faced with ... financial assets and liabilities in embarrassing detail, noting that his wife, Pat, unlike ... The Eisenhower-Nixon ticket defeated the Democratic candidates
Explanation:
