Rome, Metropolitan City of Rome, Italy
(1 Crime) an action or omission that constitutes an offense that may be prosecuted by the state and is punishable by law
(2 Criminal law) a system of law concerned with the punishment of those who commit crimes.
(3 civil law) the system of law concerned with private relations between members of a community rather than criminal, military, or religious affairs
(4 common law) the part of English law that is derived from custom and judicial precedent rather than statutes. Often contrasted with statutory law
(5 precedent) an earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances
(6 constitutional law) relating to an established set of principles governing a state.
(7 appeal) apply to a higher court for a reversal of the decision of a lower court.
(8 jurisdiction) the official power to make legal decisions and judgments.
(9 district courts) a state of federal trial court.
Hope this helps
Do the rest your self
Answer:
c) that the government should be responsible for those who cannot work.
Explanation:
Social security Act has its roots in paying for the veterans who were injured during the war period. Gradually it included the people above the age of 65 who retired from their jobs. The act came into being in 1935 to ensure social security to the unemployed, elderly and to the section of disadvantaged Americans. Federal offices enforce the program to benefit those who cannot work.
Answer: The Democratic Republican Party and the Federalists
Explanation:
The Federalists wanted a strong federal government whereas the DRP defended states' rights.
They disagreed on central banking, Hamilton(Federalist) wanted to have a federal entity to control the issuing of money(a central bank) which Jefferson(DRP) strongly opposed since the power of the bankers to control monetary creation would endanger individual liberties.
They disagreed on their interpretation of the Constitution, someone like Marshall (Chief Justice of the USA, 1800-1835) defended a loose interpretation of the Constitution whereas Jefferson stood for a strict interpretation of the Constitution.
