Newspaper accounts written at the time an event occurred would be considered a "primary source" since they offer relatively unbiased and unaltered material pertaining to the event in question.
So they can get away from slavery and or segregation it depends on what you're learning
Answer:
He makes them get off the bus because he makes them go defense on one bus and offense on the other bus. Before this it was blacks on one whites on the other. What he did in this situation was a good strategy. He was trying to make the team come together and not be appart. What he was trying to get into their heads is that just because your skin tone is different doesn't mean anything when they are on that team because they're a family.
Explanation:
The correct answer is B, presidential primaries. Let's think about why is that: what is the difference between B and the other options?
When we are talking about congressional legislative actions, public policy debates, and Supreme Court rulings, we can hardly have a real conversation with only two possible answers. Public debate is necessarily complex and multilayered; and the main goal isn't one thing or another to win, most of the times, but to achieve the best possible result.
So the press takes advantage of presidential primaries, when besides public debate also individual figures are central and covers it like a horse race. Coverage then gets less political, since it doesn't have much space for healthy and serious debates, and becomes only about the disputing figures.
