Explanation:
An increase in the number of social grants to teenage mothers is likely to have negative consequences as listed:
i) Grants make people lazy and dependent on the government
The teen mothers will not be motivated to become self-reliant by looking for work. Instead they rely on the government grants to acquire capital which they use for their needs.
ii) The child grant increases teenage pregnancy.
This is where teen mothers may become pregnant intentionally to access the grants.
iii) Recipients misuse grant money.
The teen mothers may use the grants to buy drugs and abusing of alcohol. The monies are primarily used for food and some basic non-food items such as school fees and uniforms, health and transport.
iv) Social Life
When the number of social grants to teen mothers are increased, their social lives are impacted negatively. These teen mothers see themselves as pariahs and burdens to the society. They are likely to withdraw from social life due to the shame and low self-esteem they often experience.
v) Financial Life
Due to the fact that these teen mothers often do not have stable jobs, their financial lives are uncertain. They depend on the social grants for their upkeep. If these grants are increased many teen mothers do not perceive the value of looking for employment.
vi) Education
Since most of the teen mothers drop out of school after they become pregnant, their education ceases. Increasing the number of social grants discourages them from completing their studies. They reason that since they are getting 'free money' there is no need for further education.
I hope these facts help you:) Water vapor is the gaseous phase of water. Within the hydrosphere. Water vapor can be produced from the evaporation or boiling of liquid water or from sublimation of ice.
This is an example of constitutional monarchy type of government.
Option: C
Explanation:
In constitutional monarchy King or Queen normally shares power with the British parliament where in any issue British parliament discuss, take a decision and finally recommend it for granting to Queen. In military dictatorship only one authority has the supreme power to lead.
In representative democracy public's opinion stands first. They choose the ruler of their country through electoral system where prime minister is the operational head of the country and president plays a supporting role. E.g. India. In communist state president is the head of the country. E.g. China.
For the first question: the government finally try early examples and were successful because of the massive programs which were small initiatives to address problems. The government was optimistic and believed that Americans can do greater things.
For the second question: The government was able to control monopolies by implementing rules and regulations such as: putting a price capping by regulators, regulations of quality of service, merger policy, breaking up a monopoly, rate of return regulation, and investigation of abuse.
You would be drinking German mulled wine
